Jump to content
RESET Forums (homeservershow.com)
Rod at home

Is it possible for my ISP to ruin my DSL modem?

Recommended Posts

Rod at home

I've been with CenturyLink for many years. Mainly because my alternatives are even worse. Anyway, after many years of paying for 7 Mpbs for Internet connectiivity I've upgradedus to 12 Mbps. (Tthe fastest that CenturyLink offers in my area. Believe me you've no idea how much I envy you folks with speeds an order of magnitude or more higher.)

 

So yesterday was the day we scheduled to have it done. The change didn't require anyone from CenturyLink to come to our house - everything was handled at their end. However, once it was finished we coujldn't get to the Internet at all. I had been using a Netgear ADSL modem (ADSL2+ Modem DM111PSP v2). I called Netgear Technical support and we went through everything. They couldn't find anything obvious, except for the fact that the modem's light for the Internet was red. What I mean is that, dispite the fact that the Internet light was red, there was nothing they could find which told why it was red. They said I should call CenturyLink.

 

So that's what I did next. We ran through stuff. CenturyLink told me we were receiving signal from them, that everything was fine from their end. But even though I connected 2 different laptops directly to the modem and I tried 2 different RJ-45 cables, we couldn't get it to work. CenturyLink's conclusion was that the modem was bad. And it appeared to me to be the case.

 

So now it's 8:30 at night, I've only got minutes to go to the only store I can go to (Best Buy) to get a new DSL modem. They guy there told me that he recommended I get a DSL modem with CenturyLink's because as he put it CenturyLink is switching from ADSL to something called VDSL. I've never even heard of VDSL. Anyway, the point was that even though Best Buy had a Netgear ADSL exactly like the one that went bad for $50; I was faced with the choice of bought some other DSL modem with something I've not heard of before, based upon what the guys at Best Buy were telling me, 10 minutes before they closed, and for $100. I was not a happy camper, believe me. I decided to go with it, just because if the guys at Best Buy are correct, then I might save in the loonger run. Even though, I feel used.

 

So my question to you is this: could it be possible that when CenturyLink switched over whatever it is they switched over, that doing that may have fried my old Netgear modem? All we knew was that CenturyLink was going to make the change "some time before 5 PM". That's a lot of varience. I wonder if we would have been fine if we'd turned the modem off while CenturyLink did whatever it is they did?

 

Or am I just being paranoid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cskenney

From what I can tell ADSL (and ADSL2) are not compatible with VDSL (and VDSL2).  You need to know which standard CenturyLink is using.  Based on what you have described I would take a guess that your old service was ADSL or ADSL2.  When they upgraded your service they moved you over to the VDSL/VDSL2 service.  That is why your old modem quit working.  So I don't think the old modem is fried, I think it is no longer compatible.

 

I think in this case the CenturyLink has not been upfront with you on what happens when they upgrade your service.  If they are switching from ADSL to VDSL then they have to switch out every modem in every customers home.  If the switch is only occurring for the customer paying for the faster service then they still should have told you that a new modem may be required.

 

All of this is speculation on my part.  About your high priced Best Buy purchase.  They have a return policy.  If you can find a better modem to use and set it up before the return policy deadline, then just take back the modem you bought to Best Buy.  On the flip side, it's nice to have a store like Best Buy locally that you can run to and pick up some hardware and doing business with them helps keep the doors open.

 

Good luck.  I would call CenturyLink and find out exactly what type of modem is required today for the service you now have.  Of course, if the VDSL modem is working then we know that the ADSL modem wasn't fried...it just was incompatible.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nrf

good advice. I had quite a dance with centurylink when they supposedly had a speed upgrade for my area. they brought a new modem that was vdsl compatible, then the plan changed and they ended up providing a different modem that allowed two metallic pairs to be used to get the promised bandwidth. after all that mess they couldn't render the billing at the promised pricing so I went back with cable. 

Edited by nrf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rod at home

That makes a lot of sense, cskenney. So now I know that VDSL is a real thing. And its likely that CenturyLink's upgrade to my download rate did require a new modem. But like you said, they kept me in the dark about it. I'll look around and see if I can find a VDSL modem someplace else, cheaper. But the bottom line is I was just being paranoid; CenturyLink didn't fry my modem.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • JROrtiz
      By JROrtiz
      I've been banging my head for a few days now trying to figure this out and I've run out of ideas. Hoping the very intelligent crew here can help me out.
       
      I have a Drobo 5N and a Synology RS816 on my network, both of which have been working without issue for quite some time now. I've always connected to both via Windows Explorer by simply going to the network address i.e., \\N5 and \\SYN (sample names). 
       
      I recently got a new desktop which is where the issues are coming up. When I try to go to \\N5, it results in a message saying it cannot find that location. However, \\SYN works just fine. What's strange is that I can see and manage the Drobo through the Drobo Dashboard software. What could be preventing Windows from seeing the Drobo on the network? 
       
      I've already enabled the SMB 1.x protocol, ensured the workgroup names are the same, rebooted both the machine and the Drobo, made sure network sharing is enabled, and even did a fresh install to ensure that some program I installed didn't cause the issue. Every other machine I have can access the Drobo without issue. It's just this new desktop, and everything is running Windows 10.
       
      Another strange phenomenon that I discovered is that if I go to "\\DROBO" (verbatim, not a sample name) it leads me to the Synology. Where is Windows getting the mapping from that it is directing that address to the Synology?
       
      This is driving me nuts so any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • Jason
      By Jason
      Have been running a Windows DHCP server on home WSE12R2 box for quite some time behind my Sophos UTM firewall. Also allowed me to seamlessly run Windows Deployment Services at home. WDS just worked.
       
      But if I needed to make a particular LAN IP address exception on the firewall, I had to 1.) create a Windows DHCP server reservations AND 2.) create a network definition for that IP on the Sophos UTM box. 2 steps. Not very efficient; was sure I was doing something incorrectly...
       
      Tried to migrate to Sophos UTM running the DHCP Server, but now WDS doesn't work. LAN devices can no longer PXE boot. Seems possible. Many guides. None have proven especially successful.
       
      Is it possible to run a Windows DHCP server and have Sophos UTM import DHCP reservations instead of maintaining 2 unique entries for each IP reservation (one in Windows DHCP, another on Sophos UTM box)?
       
      What is best practice?
       
       
      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    • donschmidt
      By donschmidt
      Good morning.  I've just  purchased a home still under construction and plan to have CAT6 installed throughout the living areas. I'm hoping that someone can advise me as to the specific quality/specs of cable that I should use.
      Thanks and Happy New Year.
    • Joe_Miner
      By Joe_Miner
      I've been looking at the Intel Compute Stick BOXSTK1AW32SC and was wondering if anyone here has experience with that and if the Intel AC 7265 built into it is backwardly compatible with older N and A,B wifi?
    • heavy21
      By heavy21
      I want to optimize the performance and security of my home network of servers, PCs, laptops printers, smartphones, TVs, etc.  Current network appliances include layer 2 and 3 switches (Cisco small business) and Linksys router.  I’m looking to replace the Linksys with a security (pfSense) router appliance (w/OpenVPN).  I will also be adding security cameras and a NVR to the network.
       
      The gigabit network is straightforward in structure with all Ethernet connections hanging off the24 port switch connected to the cable modem and router except a cascaded 8 port switch in a room to provide 4 Ethernet connections in a room with only one data port.  Wireless connections presently come off the Linksys but will eventually come off the to-be-purchased security/router appliance with a wireless card.  I don’t see more than 100 devices in total for the whole network.  No VLANS and no sub-netting.  All hardware supports IPv6.
       
      Hardware line up is:
      Dual Zeon server w/RAID 10 of 24 TB of storage, 64GB memory
      Cisco managed switches layer 2 and 3
      HPEX495 server
      Workstations, Desktops, Laptops, Tablets, iPads
      Printers
       
      Software line up is:
      Windows Server Essentials 2012 R2, single domain controller, storage and file server duties
      Windows 10 Pro all non-server Intel computing devices
      PLEX server for streaming audio and video to display units
      Office 365
       
      From what I’ve read so far, it appears that I need to incorporate an IP addressing scheme for clients and servers on the network.  It would also appear that I need to implement VLANS and/or sub-netting to protect access to certain files and security footage, provide guest networking with future consideration for electronic door locks and some sort of server based media distribution to various display devices,
      What are best practices on assigning client and server devices to IP ranges, fixed or dynamic IP addresses?  Do I need to assign clients or servers to IP ranges?  What are the considerations in establishing sub-nets over VLANS or vice versa?  I’m pretty sure I want to restrict access to cameras and their security footage and personal files on my workstation.
       
      Thanks for any resources and advice provided.
       


×
×
  • Create New...