Jump to content
RESET Forums (homeservershow.com)

Initial impressions of Essentials R2?


Recommended Posts

I currently have an open DirectAccess ticket with Microsoft professional support that they've been actively working for approx. 30 days. I feel compelled to keep it open for the good of the Technet community and fellow E12 users but am getting antsy to install R2.

 

What are initial impressions of those who have already made the jump to E12 R2? Aside from Hyper-V, any immediate benefits over E12?

 

Trying to decide whether the abandon my open ticket and reinstall or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jason

    15

  • Drashna Jaelre

    8

  • daveyboy37

    5

  • jmwills

    5

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Yeah sorry my sarcastic tone was obviously lost during typing.     It may be anything causing my issues including operator error but Benjamiah having identical issues suggests otherwise.  The re

Will Hyper-V programmatically limit the OSes that can be installed in each VM? Would be using in a home environment.

 

Could see possibility installing a Win 8 Ent VM for testing. Never understood installing server OSes in VMs on a server. Maybe there are good reasons?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Drashna Jaelre

http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2013/09/03/understanding-licensing-for-windows-server-2012-r2-essentials-and-the-windows-server-essentials-experience-role.aspx

 

Basically, for home use, it is "okay" to use hyperV normally, but from a licensing standpoint, only another instance of R2 Essentials.

 

 

In fact, the only way you can "legally" do this is with Essentials with none of the "other" Essentials features, and Essentials in a VM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the benefit of installing an R2

VM within Hyper-V on an R2 host?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

 

Not having to buy a 2nd computer. Saving the room needed for a 2nd computer. Running apps that may conflict with other apps on the VM host, or would conflict if they were both run on the same machine. There are others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the benefit of installing an R2

VM within Hyper-V on an R2 host?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

In a corporate environment you can separate tasks for each server (email, DNS, FSMO role DC, additional DCs, file server, etc) and have them running on multiple hardware platforms so if one bare metal (host OS) dies or requires a reboot you either have the backup VMs on another host or you can migrate them to another host. If you ran those all as actual hardware platforms the cost for physical space, HVAC, electricity and equipment purchase (and maintenance) would be exponentially higher.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2013/09/03/understanding-licensing-for-windows-server-2012-r2-essentials-and-the-windows-server-essentials-experience-role.aspx

 

Basically, for home use, it is "okay" to use hyperV normally, but from a licensing standpoint, only another instance of R2 Essentials.

 

 

In fact, the only way you can "legally" do this is with Essentials with none of the "other" Essentials features, and Essentials in a VM.

OK, just to be clear...

 

I was interested in running Server 2012 Essentials for the actual OS and then a virtual machine for Windows 7 or Windows 8 Pro/Media Center pack in order to record live tv because the Server OS does not have media center.

 

Would Essentials be able to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Drashna Jaelre

From what I understand, technically you absolutely can do this. From a licensing standpoint... don't get audited, because you'll be in deep s**t (aka you are not supposed to).  Much the same way you *can* run Server 2012R2 Standard without CALs... You can do it, but you're not supposed to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand, technically you absolutely can do this. From a licensing standpoint... don't get audited, because you'll be in deep s**t (aka you are not supposed to).  Much the same way you *can* run Server 2012R2 Standard without CALs... You can do it, but you're not supposed to.

Well would there be anything wrong if I had a license for the Windows 8 Pro I was using and only used it for that virtual instance? Or is the issue with having a virtual machine in the first place?

 

Also did anything change here between 2012 Essentials and 2012 R2 Essentials? The one I had been thinking of was R2 Essentials.

 

Now that R2 says that it comes with "Essentials Experience" on Standard and Datacenter editions, would it be better to just get Standard? Would the only disadvantage be the need for CALs? Did I read somewhere that the Standard edition would not be able to act as a DLNA media server and the Essentials would?

Edited by dandys
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...