Jump to content
RESET Forums (homeservershow.com)

Photographers


geek-accountant
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are those your images in those magazines?

 

I love images like your last one. Panning with the car to give the background a blur while keeping the car sharp really gives you a feel for the speed. Nice job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • geek-accountant

    12

  • ikon

    6

  • JDLucas

    3

  • JediTim

    7

Reality check: pros waste at least 90% of their shots. Don't worry about your 'keep rate'. A photog friend of mine was hired by National Geographic to shoot the Aswan High Dam in Egypt when it was new. He shot 10,000 frames of Kodachrome. Guess how many made it to the magazine............ 9. But that's what they wanted, lots and lots of choice. Pros do this all the time. I can only imagine it's worse with digital, since the cost of 'film' is so low.

 

Yeah yeah, I know. They'll take 10,000 and only show 5 and NEVER show you the other 9,995 so it makes you think that all shots they take are amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job on the pano. Only 1 suggestion: I think you can get away with a lot fewer shots for the pano. This one isn't all that wide in reality (I have one in my LR that's 13" tall and 74" wide) so I think you could do it with 4 or 5 shots. Are you bracketing when you shoot for HDR?

 

Hey ikon, I have reasons for the 9 shots in this picture. Each bracketed HDR is 3 pictures (0, -1, +1 exposure). I used three HDR images across. I tend to use a large amount of overlap to give the software more to work with and limit parallax error. All in all, 9 isn't so many. I wish I had YOUR printer. 74" wide shot sounds cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great new addition to the forums, thanks Dave.

 

My interests in WHS originated from finding an easy way to backup and store all my photographs, digital and scanned 35mm slides. My frustration trying to find an easy backup solution ended when the HP MediaSmart Server EX-475 came along.

From back in the day when film was the only option I used a Nikon N90s and a F5, which I still have but don’t use anymore. Have about 8,000+ 35mm slides accumulated since the mid 60’s and in the process of scanning and storing all the best ones to my EX-475.

 

HP MediaSmart EX-475 w/ 2g memory upgrade / 500g sys drive, 3.5t Storage

Add-Ins:

Stablebit Scanner

Disk Management

WHSBDB

Update History

Web Logs

 

Partial list of Nikon photo gear I use:

 

Nikon D3, D200, D100.

17-35mm f/2.8

18-200mm f/3.5 (DX)

60mm f/2.8 Micro

Sigma 180mm f/3.5 Macro

80-400mm f/4.5

Nikon Extenders TC-20e, TC-17e and TC-14e have used with 300mm f/2.8 sold last year, wish I had it back.

Also have an assortment of strobes, tripods and ball heads. My editing software of choice is Lightroom 3.4 and Photoshop CS5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed Dave added this section. Awesome Dave!!

 

Dave got the group off and running with his DSLR post, but I was interested in how many photographers are on the site. So, if you are a photographer (pro or not), what do you shoot and what gear do you use? Also, any images on the web you want to share?

 

I will start things off:

 

What I shoot:

* Sports - soccer, baseball, cheerleading, football, basketball

* Landscape - HDR, IR

 

My gear (aging as it is)

* Nikon D2x

* Nikon D2h (actually have 2 of these)

* Nikon D100 (sending to Lifepixel to convert to full time IR camera)

* Nikon 70-200vr f/2.8

* Nikon 300mm f/4

* Nikon 85mm f/1.8

* Nikon 50mm f/1.8 and the f/1.4 version

* Sigma 120-300 f/2.8

* Tokina 12-24mm f/4

* Tamaron 90mm f/2/8 (macro)

* Gitzo carbon fiber tripod and Really Right Stuff ballhead

* Various flashes and lens filters

* A few other lenses I can't remember without going down to the office and checking :(

* A couple I want to sell after getting them adjusted (Sigma 70-200f/2.8, Sigma 100-300f/4)

 

My websites

* Images - www.mhfoto.com (general site used for family/fiends so not just my select shots)

* Blog - www.mhfoto.com/blog (just started so not a lot there)

Would be interested in your D100 IR conversion. Worth the expense or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will depend on how often you end up shooting IR. For me, the IR filter needed to go on my main landscape lens (Tokina 12-24mm) will cost as much as the conversion (about $250), so I think it will be worth it for me.

 

Now, I just need to wait for the expense to fit into the budget and the camera is off for conversion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will depend on how often you end up shooting IR. For me, the IR filter needed to go on my main landscape lens (Tokina 12-24mm) will cost as much as the conversion (about $250), so I think it will be worth it for me.

 

Now, I just need to wait for the expense to fit into the budget and the camera is off for conversion!

 

I thought of both scenarios myself, using filters or conversion and decided on the conversion. Have and older 24mm prime lens that will be calibrated to the IR converted D100. Don't shoot any IR yet, but it's on my to-do list and think it would be a perfect use of the D100 rather than gathering dust on the book shelf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My D100 was one of my favorite cameras of all time. The images were great and like you said, I hate to see it gathering dust on the shelf. There really is not point in trying to sell it since the price I would receive hardly seems worth the effort of giving up this camera. But with the other cameras I have, I almost never use it anymore. So converting it to full time IR seems like the perfect solution.

 

However, I am really struggling with the conversion process using Lightroom or even Photoshop. I used to run them through Nikon Capture first and then pass the TIF image over to Photoshop. I no longer have Capture, so everything is done in either Lightroom or Photoshop and they both use the same ACR engine which doesn't handle the white balance correctly. And if you can't get the white balance correct at the start of the conversion process, it's going to be a tough up hill battle to get the image to look right, if you can at all. Of course my post processing skills are NOT top notch, so that could be part of the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I shoot:

* Family / Vacations

* Sports - soccer, baseball, football, basketball

* Landscape -HDR, Pano

 

My gear (aging as well)

* Sony Alpha A700...replaced a Minolta Maxxum 7

* Sony AF DT 16-105mm F3.5-5.6

* Minolta - AF 24-105 F3.5-4.5 D

* Minolta - AF 50 F1.7

* Minolta - AF 85 F1.4 G D

* Minolta - AF 100 F2.8 Macro

* Minolta - AF 100-400 F4.5-6.7 APO

* Flash - Sony HVL F58AM

* Flash - Minolta 5600HS

* Tripod and Monopod

* Too many camera cases...Tamrac

 

Computer Software

* Adobe Lightroom

* Adobe Photshop

* HDR - Photomatix Pro

 

My websites

* Images - www.flickr.com/jeditim

Edited by JediTim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...