Jump to content
RESET Forums (homeservershow.com)

Recommended Posts

I am replacing the C drive on WHS 2011 with an SSD.  I am in the process of installing everything from scratch due to stupidity.  When I went to the SableBit website to reinstall Scanner and Drivepool, I was surprised to see the DrivePool plug-ins.  I would like to know how the experts feel about these additions.  

 

SSD Optimizer:  I have read that the flash portion of an SSD drive has a limited number of transactions after which it will begin to fail.  While the number of transactions before failure is admittedly quite large, would the ssd optimizer speed up the SSD disk's failure?  Or, is the transaction rate before failure so high that it really does not matter?

 

Order File Placement:  Is order file placement where one disk is filled at a time, the best way to go?  Or, is the default where all of the disks are filled equally the best?  Or rather than spinning all of the disks all of the time, is it better to start with a couple of disks in the default mode and add a disk when you need it.  Thus, saving wear and energy?

 

Disk Space Equalizer:  I must confess that I do not really see much of a difference between equalizing by free space remaining, equalizing by percent used space and the default method of equalizing by placing new files onto the disk with the most free space.  And, I am open to being shown why one method should be preferred over the other.

 

Perhaps it would be good to add that I am interested in adding the Office Maven add-ins for Quicken and Office, and utilizing them to minimize memory usage on a couple of Surface Pro 4's.  Also due to starting over, I was able to expand the C:\ partition from 60 to 210 with the use of the free version of Partition Magic Server Software.  So, I am in a unique position with regard to room on the OS partition if that matters.    

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(puts on Covecube work hat)

 

 

 

SSD Optimizer:  I have read that the flash portion of an SSD drive has a limited number of transactions after which it will begin to fail.  While the number of transactions before failure is admittedly quite large, would the ssd optimizer speed up the SSD disk's failure?  Or, is the transaction rate before failure so high that it really does not matter?

 

Yes, this would significantly reduce the lifespan of your SSDs. 

 

However, check out some of the stress tests. The lifetime is pretty significant, and you may end up wanting to replace them for larger capacity before they come close to dying. Also, Seriously, $80 for a 240-256GB SSD. 

 

Also, the balancer is only for new files. Modifies are done to the underlying disk, unless you use file placement rules. 

 

I have 2x 128GB OCZ's and both are about a year old, have only been used for the SSD Optimizer, and the media wearout indicator is at 84 (so, it's life is 84%, plenty of life left). And I download a LOT of data... so these drives get absolutely thrashed. 

 

 

Order File Placement:  Is order file placement where one disk is filled at a time, the best way to go?  Or, is the default where all of the disks are filled equally the best?  Or rather than spinning all of the disks all of the time, is it better to start with a couple of disks in the default mode and add a disk when you need it.  Thus, saving wear and energy?

 

Yes. This fills up one (or more, if duplication is enabled) at a time.  

 

There are a number of reasons to do this, but power saving (or smooth playback) is the main reason.  Since one disk at a time is filled up, if you're accessing multiple files in the same disk (such as for music, raw DVD/BluRAY content, etc), the contents of the folder are most likely on the same disk, and should only spin up that disk. That will definitely save on energy, potentially.  

Also, there can be a slight delay to spin up a disk, if the files were on different disks, which could cause performance issues.   This would bypass the issue.

 

 

The other thing that people use it for, is in conjunction with products like SnapRAID (to get snapshot parity, aka, not real time). 

 

 

Also, if you want to use this and the SSD optimizer, just use the SSD Optimizer. There is an issue with using both (infinite loop, stuck moving files around constantly). So the SSD Optimizer balancer has a "ordered file placement" option, as well.  

This is what I use, and my archive disks are completely full (less than 50GBs free)

 

Disk Space Equalizer:  I must confess that I do not really see much of a difference between equalizing by free space remaining, equalizing by percent used space and the default method of equalizing by placing new files onto the disk with the most free space.  And, I am open to being shown why one method should be preferred over the other.

 

The balancing system doesn't aggressively move files around.  So when you add a new disk, the software will use the disk over time, but it won't immediately move files around to fill this disk up. 

Instead, new files are placed on the disk with the most available free space (measured in absolute, not percentage).  Over time, it will fill up all of the disks equally, mostly. 

 

This is for mostly used by people that have added a new disk, and want the pool to equally utilize all disks immediately.  Or want the same percent filled on each disk (as a 1TB may not be used until the 3TB has 2TB of data on it, for instance)

 

It's much more of an edge case than the other two balancers. 

 

 

Perhaps it would be good to add that I am interested in adding the Office Maven add-ins for Quicken and Office, and utilizing them to minimize memory usage on a couple of Surface Pro 4's.  Also due to starting over, I was able to expand the C:\ partition from 60 to 210 with the use of the free version of Partition Magic Server Software.  So, I am in a unique position with regard to room on the OS partition if that matters.    

 

 

Is this for work/professionally?  If so, be careful with those add-ins.  Because it's leveraging RemoteApp (Terminal Services, aka Remote Desktop), it may be legally dubious. For home use, it shouldn't be an issue.  

 

As for the OS partition, that's always a good move. Though, if you delete the data partition, you can use Disk Management to extend it. That's what I usually do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drashna, 

 

No, worries about professional stuff.  It is all home use.  You could say it is all amateur play.  In fact, it would be way cheaper to just purchase a WD or Seagate backup system, and forget about the server.  My wife will use the Quicken and Office for our home budgeting etc.  I work in an elementary school and do teach some information systems, but mostly use Google drive and applications while there.  Except when we are traveling, we almost never use remote access.  In fact, I have a hard time keeping it connected.   

 

If I am understanding correctly, you are suggesting that I use the SSD optimizer and for compatibility and ease of use reasons, forget about the other two plug-ins.  Is that correct?

 

Thanks, I appreciate your time and value your response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About the Office Maven stuff, I just wanted to make sure.  Better safe than sorry....

 

 

As for the DrivePool stuff, no. 

 

If you want to use the SSD Optimizer, then do so.  If you want to use the Ordered File Placement, then do so. But if you want to do both... then *just* do the SSD Optimizer.  This is because these two balancers DO NOT play well together, and cause an "infinite file movement loop".  

 

Otherwise, you can use whichever you want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WoW! I can do whatever I want?  Please let my wife know.  

 

Seriously, thank you for your response.  I think I will use the SSD optimizer and stay with the default on the drive fill.  

 

I also appreciated your mentioning, "if you delete the data partition, you can use Disk Management to extend it. That's what I usually do."  After reading your comment, I did just that.  It should make my life much easier when it comes time to replace the C drive in the future.  Thank you.

 

You mentioned using two SSD drives.  Do you include them in the pool or, are they just there to speed up data transfer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WoW! I can do whatever I want?  Please let my wife know.  

 

Seriously, thank you for your response.  I think I will use the SSD optimizer and stay with the default on the drive fill.  

 

I also appreciated your mentioning, "if you delete the data partition, you can use Disk Management to extend it. That's what I usually do."  After reading your comment, I did just that.  It should make my life much easier when it comes time to replace the C drive in the future.  Thank you.

 

You mentioned using two SSD drives.  Do you include them in the pool or, are they just there to speed up data transfer?

 

 

I have one for the system disk and two for the pool. 

 

And they are there mostly to speed up transfers to the pool.  Nothing stays on them for long.  

 

But part of the reason for that is that I have Seagate Archive drives and the SMR feature has some pretty atrocious write performance (in certain cases). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • Rodf
      By Rodf
      I'm looking into replacing my desktop's old, failing HD with an SSD. I've got a Dell XPS 8700. I've look up the configuration on Dell's website, entering my machine's service tag (DK49122). I've found the component which is listed as:
       
      KPF74 : Module,Hard Drive,1T,S3,7.2K,5 12E,#1,G-BP INFO,1ST BOOT,HARD DRIVE HD,1TB,S3,7.2K,512E,SGT-GRDABP  
      I know it's a 1 TB drive. It looks to me like it's a SATA III drive. Am I correct? 
       
      Assuming I've correctly identified the drive, then I've found what looks like a good replacement part on Newegg which is listed like this: SAMSUNG 860 EVO Series 2.5" 1TB SATA III V-NAND 3-bit MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-76E1T0B/AM
       
      So, have a got a good replacement SSD for my machine's old HD?
    • xelent
      By xelent
      Hi there,
       
      I've just gotten my old Proliant server out from mothballs recently to use as a Backup controller for my photographic archive. It's specs are a standard G840 2.8GHz Dual core with 16 GB of ram installed with a standard 350 watt PSU. I'm running WSE 2019 with 4x1TB HDD's installed in the 4 bay drive cage. 3 drives are formatted to RAID 0 in WSE (not embedded HP RAID) and one drive acts as the system/boot drive.

      The server is surprisingly responsive given its age, with LAN transfer speeds between 84-94MBs. So has pretty much taken center stage in my backup control between my  external drives and 4x1TB RAID 0 NAS.
       
      However, I have been wanting to attach a 256GB SSD boot drive for my OS, so that I can utilize the full capacity of my 4 bay drive. It seems that the BIOS will not let you boot any HDD/SSD off the spare SATA connection on my MB. Anyway I am hoping to eventually attach a PCIe USB 3 card to that. But in the meantime I would like to boot a separate drive other than the 4 bay one already installed.

      I gather that you can install a PCIe SSD card on this machine. But it's not clear to me as to what kind of card and drive would be suitable for this server. I realize that my MB is PCIe gen 2, which will incur diminished speed compared to the latest gen 3 MBs. But should I be using NVMe or SATA m.2 drives? Or does it even matter? Also will the BIOS allow me to boot from this drive?
       
      Thanks for taking the time.
    • Karazzi
      By Karazzi
      Hi everyone.
       
      New to this forum.
      I have a gen8 microserver running at home, where I have installed an SSD in the ODD sata slot. On the SSD I have installed Ubuntu Server 18.04.
      I have then created a logical volume witht the raid controller and can then boot to the SSD. So far so good.
      My problem emerges when I reboot the system. The logical volume disapears and it gives the error: "boot logical drive is configured but is missing or offline".
      I then have to go into the utility and reconfigure the logical volume. Kind of annoying, when trying to run a headless setup.
       
    • Joe_Miner
      By Joe_Miner
      The first WD 4TB Red I installed in my WHS2011 DrivePool on January 30, 2014 is going to be retired.  DrivePool was sending me Smart Warnings via email regarding excessive head parkings.  I yanked it out and replaced with a WD 6TB Red.  
       
      Got 5+ years out of the WD 4TB Red so that's not bad!  My very first WD 3TB RED is still going strong in my DrivePool -- it's got to be pushing 6+ years now.
       
      Currently, my DrivePool is made of 6 drives, all Reds: 1 3TB, 4 4TB, and now the single 6TB.
    • Laris
      By Laris
      Hi all,
       
      Now I share my extreamly mod for your reference
       



×
×
  • Create New...