Jump to content


Photo

Intel RST RAID-1 plus SSD SRT possible?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Mr_Smartepants

Mr_Smartepants

    HSS Pro

  • Members
  • 234 posts

Posted 09 August 2012 - 12:31 PM

I'm going to be building a new system to replace my current desktop.
I am currently running a Gigabyte EX38-DS4 with a Q6600 and 8GB RAM. This will become the basis for my home server once the new desktop is up and running.
I am also currently running two 2TB Seagate drives in RAID-1 using the onboard controller with a 128 GB OCZ Agility3 SSD as boot drive.

I plan on building a system with a z77 based board (likely an Asrock z77 Extreme4) paired with an Intel i7 3770S and 16GB RAM.

My question is can I use the two 2TB drives in RAID-1 (I'll have to rebuild the array anyway when moving to the new controller) paired with the SSD using Intel's Smart Response Technology (SSD caching/limited to 60GB) or would I be better using the same setup I have now (SSD as boot, RAID-1 for files).

Some sites say that SRT can NOT be used with a RAID-1 array and others report success. I want the fastest system I can without sacrificing reliability. On this system, uptime is key. It seems to me that adding SRT to the mix is just one more thing that can go wrong.

I'm keen on hearing your thoughts or anything I may have missed.
HP EX490 (E5200 CPU & 4GB RAM upgrades). DriverPacks.net Administrator and Team Lead. Some heroes don't wear capes, they wear Kevlar!
Stand-Alone Driver Disk (SAD2) update utility for DriverPacks.net (installs drivers automatically on all versions of Windows from 2000 to 2012).

#2 Joe_Miner

Joe_Miner

    HSS Elite

  • Moderators
  • 1,734 posts
  • LocationCentral Illinois

Posted 09 August 2012 - 01:18 PM

In all the things I tried with ISRT that was one I didn't try but I believe Paul did with a RAID 0 array. He has a write up on his gaming machine and he talked about it on a BYOB 70 podcast. In BYOB 66 Podcast Paul talks about RAID 0 Caching which may be more relevant to what you want to do (If you can Cach a RAID 0 I would think you could Cach a RAID 1 but I have no evidence supporting that.) I may have misunderstood his setu-up.

I wouldn't spend $ on hardware until after talking to Paul about his experience though.

Please let us know what you find out. Thanks!
WHS-V1: HP EX-487: 4*WD20EARX, Athena AP-MFATX30, 4GB G.Skill, E5200, Stablebit Scanner-|-
WHS-2011: HP N54L G7, Kingston ECC 8GB KVR1333D3E9SK2/8G, OS: 256GB M4, 5*ST3000DM001, WD PCIe USB3, R640L, Stablebit DrivePool & Scanner -|-
Test Labs: HP N40L, G.Skill 16GB F3-1333C9D-16GAO, rr2720 -|- HP N40L, Kingston ECC 16GB KVR1333D3E9SK2/16G -|-
S2012 Hyper-V Lab: Lian-Li K9WX, GA-Z77X-UD5H, i7-3770, 32GB G.Skill, 240GB Corsair GT + various HDD's-|-
Desktop W8P64: HAF 932,GA-X58A-UD3R,i7-930,12GB,240GB Corsair GS + various HDD's,HD5850,Samsung Series9 & 213T+Planar PX2710MW,C920 -|-
HTPC3 W8P64WMC: GD05B, GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3, i5-2500K, 16GB G.Skill, Corsair GTX 240GB, Crucial M4 256GB , C910, Camtasia-|-
Laptop W8P64WMC: Acer 1810T, 4GB RAM, 240GB Corsair GT SSD-|-

#3 Mr_Smartepants

Mr_Smartepants

    HSS Pro

  • Members
  • 234 posts

Posted 09 August 2012 - 01:40 PM

Thanks for the links. Interesting reads.
The other I read that has me turned off of SRT is that TRIM is disabled in SRT. Can anyone confirm that? Seems like a great way to kill an SSD.
HP EX490 (E5200 CPU & 4GB RAM upgrades). DriverPacks.net Administrator and Team Lead. Some heroes don't wear capes, they wear Kevlar!
Stand-Alone Driver Disk (SAD2) update utility for DriverPacks.net (installs drivers automatically on all versions of Windows from 2000 to 2012).

#4 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,600 posts

Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:13 PM

My understanding is that TRIM doesn't make much difference to SSD life; that it's mainly garbage collection; that wear levelling is the main feature that extends SSD life. The thing I have heard about TRIM is that it helps stop the eventual slowdown of the drive, but that many consider not to be that big of a deal.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.


#5 pcdoc

pcdoc

    HSS Legend

  • Moderators
  • 3,568 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, California

Posted 13 August 2012 - 06:31 AM

ikon is right. Wear leveling is at a deeper level in the code and has little to do with Trim. That said, you cache drive performance will slow by ~30% as you use it. Still a great option but figure that into the equation.

Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems


#6 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,600 posts

Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:28 AM

Also, don't forget you can return the drive to brand new performance levels again by simply restoring the drive from a backup. Since you're a WHS user, that's makes it doubly easy to do every few months.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.


#7 ImTheTypeOfGuy

ImTheTypeOfGuy

    HSS Master

  • Donating Member
  • 2,344 posts
  • LocationhOUston

Posted 18 August 2012 - 04:16 PM

Also, don't forget you can return the drive to brand new performance levels again by simply restoring the drive from a backup. Since you're a WHS user, that's makes it doubly easy to do every few months.


I think you mean by doing a secure erase, not a restore.
ITTOG


- WHS V1: Dell XPS 420; Quad Core @ 2.66 GHz; 4 GB RAM
- S2008R2: Lian Li PC-A70F, EVGA X58 3X SLI, i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz; 12 GB RAM, 2 x 250 GB WD Black Caviar in IcyDock Enclosure with Raid 1, EVGA GeForce GT 240, 12TB RAID5
- HTPC: Silverstone Lascala, Gigabyte GA-H55-USB3, i3 530 @ 2.93 GHz, 4 GB Ram, 60 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD, 12TB RAID5
- Personal Desktop: Lian Li PC-9F, ASUS Sabertooth P67, i7 2600k @ 4.1 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 x 120 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD's in Raid 0, EVGA GTX580
- Kids Desktop: Dell Dimension 8400 Pentium 4 560, 3.6GHz, 2 GB RAM - Lets not forget this beauty!
- Other Devices: iPad, Boxee Box, XBox's, PS3, Wii, and HP TouchPad

#8 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,600 posts

Posted 18 August 2012 - 07:22 PM

Actually, I've heard that completely restoring an SSD from a backup image will rewrite all the files with zero fragmentation, which will restore the SSD to its original performance. If that's not correct, please let me know.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.


#9 ImTheTypeOfGuy

ImTheTypeOfGuy

    HSS Master

  • Donating Member
  • 2,344 posts
  • LocationhOUston

Posted 19 August 2012 - 11:16 AM

That it may do but it doesn't refresh the cells it didn't write to. This is why trim and secure erase are so important.
ITTOG


- WHS V1: Dell XPS 420; Quad Core @ 2.66 GHz; 4 GB RAM
- S2008R2: Lian Li PC-A70F, EVGA X58 3X SLI, i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz; 12 GB RAM, 2 x 250 GB WD Black Caviar in IcyDock Enclosure with Raid 1, EVGA GeForce GT 240, 12TB RAID5
- HTPC: Silverstone Lascala, Gigabyte GA-H55-USB3, i3 530 @ 2.93 GHz, 4 GB Ram, 60 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD, 12TB RAID5
- Personal Desktop: Lian Li PC-9F, ASUS Sabertooth P67, i7 2600k @ 4.1 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2 x 120 GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSD's in Raid 0, EVGA GTX580
- Kids Desktop: Dell Dimension 8400 Pentium 4 560, 3.6GHz, 2 GB RAM - Lets not forget this beauty!
- Other Devices: iPad, Boxee Box, XBox's, PS3, Wii, and HP TouchPad

#10 pcdoc

pcdoc

    HSS Legend

  • Moderators
  • 3,568 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, California

Posted 19 August 2012 - 11:41 AM

Actually, I've heard that completely restoring an SSD from a backup image will rewrite all the files with zero fragmentation, which will restore the SSD to its original performance. If that's not correct, please let me know.


Not sure that this is correct. Re-imaging the drive does not reset all the states of memory to unused as far as I know. For that you do need secure erase. That said, I think the whole RAID/SSD thing is not worth using if you have to go through all that. My thought is that you will chasing your tail if you try and keep trim level performance on your RAID. The choice should be that you either create a RAID and live with the 30% degradation (which is still ultra fast) which occurs almost right away, or forgo the RAID and get the largest and fastest SSD you can get and enjoy it. The though of having to secure erase, and restore every couple of months is not worth it and may even do more damage than it will help. Just my two cents.

Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems


#11 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,600 posts

Posted 19 August 2012 - 01:51 PM

thanks pcdoc. And I agree, chasing after that so-called lost performance is for people who just can't stand that they're not getting every last bit they believe they paid for. As you said, the performance is typically so good it outshines anything else you could use, so just accept and enjoy.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users