Jump to content


Photo

FreeNAS and VirtualBox


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 donwieber

donwieber

    HSS Star

  • Members
  • 70 posts

Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:07 PM

Right now I have a seperate FreeNAS build with 6 2TB harddrives using ZFS Raid-Z2 and it works great but I was wondering if I should install Windows7, and then run a virtualized FreeNAS in VirtualBox?? I would like to use the PC as a Media Center and then FreeNAS with it's ability to have it's Raid-Z2 data protection. I have never used VirtualBox with pass-through to directly access the hard drive. Does it work good? Is it a good idea to run a NAS system virtualized? What other problems might I encounter?

Thanks

Don

#2 jcollison

jcollison

    HSS Advanced

  • Moderators
  • 674 posts
  • LocationBellevue, NE

Posted 16 May 2012 - 07:00 AM

The one big drawback to virtual box is that it really doesn't have a native way to gracefully recover from an unexpected reboot. So you would always have to be watch at windows 7 box for uptime. Not a huge deal and there are hacks around it, but it's not the best "always on" solution because of this.

On the flip side, it's very easy to use. Average guy stuff for sure.

#3 jmwills

jmwills

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 5,370 posts
  • LocationHuntsville, AL - Kandahar, AFG

Posted 16 May 2012 - 08:42 AM

Hyper V clients handle parent reboots very gracefully and will restart themselves to the previous state.
Windows 7 Desktop - Antec 100 Case, Intel D8H67BL, OCZ 550W PSU, Intel i3-530 CPU w/16GB G-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM
Server 2012 - Fractal Arc Midi, CoolerMaster M600 PSU, ASUS P8H67V, Intel i5-2500 CPU w/32GBG-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM, 90 GIG OCZ SSD OS Drive – Roles: Hyper-V (WHS-SharePoint-DC-SQL-Exchange-WSE 2012), Print Server - Rocket RAID 2720 5x2TB
HTPC Build - Silverstone GD05 Case, ASUS P7H55-M PRO, CoolerMaster M600W PSU, Intel i3-530 CPU w/4GB G-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM. OCZ 60GB SSD Drive for the OS with a 120GB WD 2.5" Blue drive for data storage.
Travel Laptop: Dell XPSL502X 15.6"

#4 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,870 posts

Posted 16 May 2012 - 09:37 AM

And, honestly, Hyper-V is not really hard to use.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.


#5 pcdoc

pcdoc

    HSS Legend

  • Moderators
  • 3,593 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, California

Posted 17 May 2012 - 02:48 PM

I agree with ikon, If you have Server 2008R2 (or soon Windows 8 although not where I would run it), it is not much different or harder to run than Virtual box and is far more robust for a full time environment. I think it has allot to do with what you want to do. To answer your question, both will handle the pass through just fine.

Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users