Jump to content


Photo

3TB Drive Performance on MicroServer & Hyper-V Pass Thru

3tb drive performance microserver hyper-v st3000dm001 wd30ezrx

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Joe_Miner

Joe_Miner

    HSS Elite

  • Moderators
  • 1,820 posts
  • LocationCentral Illinois

Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:50 AM

Everyone know's from my earlier thread that I had placed a Seagate ST3000DM001 3TB drive and tested it's performance in my MicroServer that is running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.

The Seagate is a SATA III drive though the MicroServer is only a SATA II so I expected some degradation in performance but as you recall the performance was amazing. One of the things I wanted to do was to learn how to do a SATA drive pass through to a VM Running in Hyper-V on the MicroServer. The Seagate seemed to be the perfect test subject for this. Below is the performance of The Seagate 3TB first running under Server 2008 R2 Enterprise then The Seagate 3TB is running attached to WHS 2011 VM as a Hyper-V pass through disk.

Posted ImagePosted Image

While the performance curves are different early on they still max out at respectible levels and from my perspective it was educational to do the pass thru and see the real world results.

Of course, it couldn't end here -- I felt obligated to pull my 3TB WD drive from my main client and test it's performance and the Hyper-V pass thru in the Microserver.

My 3TB WD30EZRX is also a SATA III drive.

Again, I tested it while running under Server 2008 R2 and then running as a Hyper-V pass thru to a VM WHS 2011.

Posted ImagePosted Image

I'm a bit taken aback by the huge difference in performance between the two drives. The WD performs quite a bit better when attached to a SATA III port in my Main Client.

But clearly, the Seagate 3TB is a top performer in the MicroServer.

WHS-V1: HP EX-487: 4*WD20EARX, Athena AP-MFATX30, 4GB G.Skill, E5200, Stablebit Scanner-|-
WHS-2011: HP N54L G7, Kingston ECC 8GB KVR1333D3E9SK2/8G, OS: 256GB M4, 5*ST3000DM001, WD PCIe USB3, R640L, Stablebit DrivePool & Scanner -|-
Labs: HP N40L, G.Skill 16GB F3-1333C9D-16GAO, Misc HDD's -|- HP N40L, KingstonECC KVR1333D3E9SK2/16G, CorsairGT60GB, 1xVR, Misc HDD's -|-
S2012DC VM Lab: Lian-Li K9WX, Z77X-UD5H, i7-3770, 32GBG.Skill, 240GBCorsairGT, 2xSamsung840Pro256G, 2xVR's, + Misc HDD's-|-
Desktop W8P64: HAF 932,GA-X58A-UD3R,i7-930,12GB,240GB Corsair GS + Misc HDD's,HD5850,Samsung Series9 & 213T+Planar PX2710MW,C920 -|-
HTPC3 W8P64WMC: GD05B, GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3, i5-2500K, 16GB G.Skill, Corsair GTX 240GB, Crucial M4 256GB , C910, Camtasia-|-
Laptop W8P64WMC: Acer 1810T, 4GB RAM, 240GB Corsair GT SSD-|-


#2 ikon

ikon

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 8,870 posts

Posted 04 March 2012 - 12:02 PM

Very interesting. Just goes to show that matching specs are no guarantee of matching performance.

If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3tb, drive performance, microserver, hyper-v, st3000dm001, wd30ezrx

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users