Jump to content

  •  

  • Photo

    3TB Drive Performance on MicroServer & Hyper-V Pass Thru

    3tb drive performance microserver hyper-v st3000dm001 wd30ezrx

    • Please log in to reply
    1 reply to this topic

    #1 Joe_Miner

    Joe_Miner

      HSS Legend

    • Moderators
    • 3,424 posts
    • LocationCentral Illinois

    Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:50 AM

    Everyone know's from my earlier thread that I had placed a Seagate ST3000DM001 3TB drive and tested it's performance in my MicroServer that is running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.

    The Seagate is a SATA III drive though the MicroServer is only a SATA II so I expected some degradation in performance but as you recall the performance was amazing. One of the things I wanted to do was to learn how to do a SATA drive pass through to a VM Running in Hyper-V on the MicroServer. The Seagate seemed to be the perfect test subject for this. Below is the performance of The Seagate 3TB first running under Server 2008 R2 Enterprise then The Seagate 3TB is running attached to WHS 2011 VM as a Hyper-V pass through disk.

    Posted ImagePosted Image

    While the performance curves are different early on they still max out at respectible levels and from my perspective it was educational to do the pass thru and see the real world results.

    Of course, it couldn't end here -- I felt obligated to pull my 3TB WD drive from my main client and test it's performance and the Hyper-V pass thru in the Microserver.

    My 3TB WD30EZRX is also a SATA III drive.

    Again, I tested it while running under Server 2008 R2 and then running as a Hyper-V pass thru to a VM WHS 2011.

    Posted ImagePosted Image

    I'm a bit taken aback by the huge difference in performance between the two drives. The WD performs quite a bit better when attached to a SATA III port in my Main Client.

    But clearly, the Seagate 3TB is a top performer in the MicroServer.

    WHS-2011: HAF932,X58A-UD3R,i7-930, 12GB, HD6450, R640L, Corsair GS240GB, 5in3FatCage, 3*DuoSwap, 5*Red4T+1*Red3T, DrivePool&Scanner-|-  CrashPlan -|-
    HTPC1 W10P: N40L ECCKVR1333D3E9SK2/8G, HD5450,R620L,256GB Crucial M4 -|- 

    HTPC2 W10P Gen8 MS E3-1265LV2,ECC KVR1333D3E9SK2/16G, P222/512FBWC, SDM, OS: Corsair GT240GB RAID0 -|- 

    Desktop W10P: Lian-Li PC-K9WX,Z77X-UD5H, i7-3770,32GB-RAM,OS-SamPro840-256SSD, ST3000DM001 -|-
    LAB W10P: GD05B, Z68MX-UD2H-B3, i5-2500K, 16GB G.Skill, CorsairGTX240GB, VR -|- LAB S2012R2 HP ML30 Gen9 Xeon E3-1240v5 -|-

    LAB W8.1p HP ML10v2 E3-1220v3 ECC KVR16E11K4/32, OS: Corsair GT240GB, P222/512FBWC 4*5TB RAID5, 4*1TB RAID10, Samsung 840 Pro SSD VHDs -|-

    LAB Laptop W10P: Acer 1810T, 4GB RAM, 256GB Crucial M4-|- HP Stream 7 W10 -|- Raspberry Pi 2 -|- DragonBoard 410c -|- Surface 3 W10 -|- Router: DIR 890L/R


    #2 ikon

    ikon

      HSS Elite Genius

    • Donating Member
    • 16,090 posts

    Posted 04 March 2012 - 12:02 PM

    Very interesting. Just goes to show that matching specs are no guarantee of matching performance.

    If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.






    Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3tb, drive performance, microserver, hyper-v, st3000dm001, wd30ezrx

    Skins By Invisioneers