Jump to content


  • Photo

    3TB Drive Performance on MicroServer & Hyper-V Pass Thru

    3tb drive performance microserver hyper-v st3000dm001 wd30ezrx

    • Please log in to reply
    1 reply to this topic

    #1 Joe_Miner


      HSS Master

    • Moderators
    • 2,961 posts
    • LocationCentral Illinois

    Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:50 AM

    Everyone know's from my earlier thread that I had placed a Seagate ST3000DM001 3TB drive and tested it's performance in my MicroServer that is running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.

    The Seagate is a SATA III drive though the MicroServer is only a SATA II so I expected some degradation in performance but as you recall the performance was amazing. One of the things I wanted to do was to learn how to do a SATA drive pass through to a VM Running in Hyper-V on the MicroServer. The Seagate seemed to be the perfect test subject for this. Below is the performance of The Seagate 3TB first running under Server 2008 R2 Enterprise then The Seagate 3TB is running attached to WHS 2011 VM as a Hyper-V pass through disk.

    Posted ImagePosted Image

    While the performance curves are different early on they still max out at respectible levels and from my perspective it was educational to do the pass thru and see the real world results.

    Of course, it couldn't end here -- I felt obligated to pull my 3TB WD drive from my main client and test it's performance and the Hyper-V pass thru in the Microserver.

    My 3TB WD30EZRX is also a SATA III drive.

    Again, I tested it while running under Server 2008 R2 and then running as a Hyper-V pass thru to a VM WHS 2011.

    Posted ImagePosted Image

    I'm a bit taken aback by the huge difference in performance between the two drives. The WD performs quite a bit better when attached to a SATA III port in my Main Client.

    But clearly, the Seagate 3TB is a top performer in the MicroServer.
    • 0

    WHS-2011: HAF932,X58A-UD3R,i7-930, 12GB, HD6450, R640L, Corsair GS240GB, 5in3FatCage, 2xDuoSwap, 5*Red4T+Red3T+2*Red1T, DrivePool&Scanner-|- 
    S2012R2 Gen8 Xeon E3-1265LV2,ECC KVR1333D3E9SK2/16G, P222/512FBWC, SDM, OS: 2*Corsair GT240GB RAID0 -|- 

    Win7: N40L ECCKVR1333D3E9SK2/8G, HD5450,R620L,256GB Crucial M4, TBD -|- ?: N40L, G.Skill F3-1333C9D-16GAO, R640L, TBD -|-
    Desktop W8.1P: Lian-Li PC-K9WX,Z77X-UD5H, i7-3770,32GB-RAM,OS-SamPro840-256SSD -|-
    HTPC3 W8.1PWMC: GD05B, Z68MX-UD2H-B3, i5-2500K, 16GB G.Skill, CorsairGTX240GB -|-
    Laptop W8.1PWMC: Acer 1810T, 4GB RAM, 256GB Crucial M4-|- Toshiba Encore Mini WT7-C16M -|- HP Stream 7 -|- Raspberry Pi 2

    #2 ikon


      HSS Elite Genius

    • Donating Member
    • 15,916 posts

    Posted 04 March 2012 - 12:02 PM

    Very interesting. Just goes to show that matching specs are no guarantee of matching performance.
    • 0

    If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.

    Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3tb, drive performance, microserver, hyper-v, st3000dm001, wd30ezrx

    Skins By Invisioneers