Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:11 PM
Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:51 PM
Posted 23 September 2011 - 09:03 PM
Edited by welchwerks, 23 September 2011 - 09:04 PM.
Server:
4U Norco case with Windows Server 2012 on Dual Xeon 5620's, Supermicro X8DTH-6F with IPMI , LSI Raid 9260-4i linked to Chenbro 24 port 6Gb expander for 24 drives including Cachecade 2.0/Fastpath, 48GB's ECC Registered PNY Ram, 10 Intel Teamed Nics, Raids: 4 Pair / 8 Drive Raid 10 with a global hot spare then 2 - 4 Drive Raid 5's (all using the the 4 x 64GB SSD Drives in Raid 1 with LSI CacheCade 2.0 for a total of 256 GB Cache) all on 6GB using SAS connectors in Norco 15U rack plus APC 1500 UPS, PFSENSE Router in 1U case with SSD, 24 port NETGEAR GS724T-300NAS switch,
Posted 24 September 2011 - 11:30 AM
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:29 PM
Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:32 PM
Isn't it always??like everyone says, it's about size.
Edited by ikon, 24 September 2011 - 01:33 PM.
If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.
Posted 24 September 2011 - 02:57 PM
Not much to add. like everyone says, it's about size.
Posted 24 September 2011 - 03:59 PM
Posted 24 September 2011 - 05:41 PM
That's what she said!
(I think we might have it right this time.)
Posted 24 September 2011 - 07:19 PM
thanks for the info.I looked into this one time and found that GPT was superior to MBR for a couple of reasons, most notably:
" GPT disks use primary and backup partition tables for redundancy and CRC32 fields for improved partition data structure integrity."
Source : http://msdn.microsof...e/gg463525.aspx
If at first you don't succeed, do it like your mother told you.
Posted 24 September 2011 - 09:37 PM
Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems
Posted 24 September 2011 - 09:50 PM
I looked into this one time and found that GPT was superior to MBR for a couple of reasons, most notably:
" GPT disks use primary and backup partition tables for redundancy and CRC32 fields for improved partition data structure integrity."
Source : http://msdn.microsof...e/gg463525.aspx
Thanks for the information however there is one thing to note that is not covered. GPT partitions are not supported by most backup programs. Acronis needs a paid option, and others do not support it at all so use with caution and do your homework before going down this road to make sure that what you are doing for backup will work. The issue is not so much backup but restore portion is a problem.
Posted 25 September 2011 - 01:43 AM
whs2011 supports gpt backup right? My raid array is a gpt partition and while I've only had do a restore once, it went off without a hitch.Thanks for the information however there is one thing to note that is not covered. GPT partitions are not supported by most backup programs.
I use gpt for all of my data drives..mbr for boot drives of course as nothing I have supports efi
Thanks -- I've been trying to read up on it -- appreciate the link. Do you use GPT then?
Edited by tojoski, 25 September 2011 - 01:47 AM.
Posted 25 September 2011 - 03:52 AM
whs2011 supports gpt backup right? My raid array is a gpt partition and while I've only had do a restore once, it went off without a hitch.
I use gpt for all of my data drives..mbr for boot drives of course as nothing I have supports efi
Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems
Posted 25 September 2011 - 07:00 AM
Posted 25 September 2011 - 07:05 AM
Posted 25 September 2011 - 07:59 AM
Quote
WHS 2011 does not support GPT natively. It will backup files from it if they are on your server, however if a GPT is on your client you are in for some trouble.
Here's a good post. GPT backups are discussed in the comments http://gcoupe.wordpr...me-server-2011/
WHS will backup GPT drives and restore files, but there are negative results when restoring a GPT boot partitions. GPT boot drives are found on UEFI supported motherboards running Windows 7.
Posted 25 September 2011 - 06:40 PM
Main Server - WHS 2011, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5 (5x3T) + 2T of Mirror + 2T of backup
Second Server - 2008R2, Core I5-2500, 12T RAID 5
Main Systems - Core I7-2600k, 16 Gigs DDR3-1600, 180 Gig Intel 330 SSD Max IOPS 240 Gig Vertex 3, 2T Sata 3 for local Backup
Other systems - Core I7-2600, Core I3-530's, Core I5-2500, Core I7-920, Core I3-2100, and G620 (see System List)
My Blogs - The Docs Blog and Tablet Resource
BYOB Videos - TheBYOBPodcast
For a complete system List: Computer Systems
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users