Jump to content


Photo

WHS vs NAS Article in MaximumPC


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 jmwills

jmwills

    HSS Genius

  • Donating Member
  • 5,098 posts
  • LocationHuntsville, AL

Posted 29 November 2010 - 12:48 PM

We are late getting magazines over here and the only reason I bought this one was to read the article comparing WHS to Synology NAS box priced at $900. I think some of the comparisons are a bit flawed such as fault tolerance but nonetheless a good article. WHS came out the wimmer.

(Obviously written before last weeks news)
Windows 7 Desktop - Antec 100 Case, Intel D8H67BL, OCZ 550W PSU, Intel i3-530 CPU w/16GB G-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM
Server 2012 - Fractal Arc Midi, CoolerMaster M600 PSU, ASUS P8H67V, Intel i5-2500 CPU w/32GBG-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM, 90 GIG OCZ SSD OS Drive – Roles: Hyper-V (WHS-SharePoint-DC-SQL-Exchange-WSE 2012), Print Server - Rocket RAID 2720 5x2TB
HTPC Build - Silverstone GD05 Case, ASUS P7H55-M PRO, CoolerMaster M600W PSU, Intel i3-530 CPU w/4GB G-Skill DDR3 1333 RAM. OCZ 60GB SSD Drive for the OS with a 120GB WD 2.5" Blue drive for data storage.
Travel Laptop: Dell XPSL502X 15.6"

#2 cskenney

cskenney

    HSS Elite

  • Administrators
  • 1,313 posts
  • LocationNorthern Illinois

Posted 29 November 2010 - 04:32 PM

I saw that article and I also didn't agree with some of their assessments but in the end they still favored the WHS.
WHS - HP EX485 MediaSmart Server Intel Celeron 2 Ghz, 2 GB RAM, 1 TB system drive, 2 x 2 TB storage drive<br />
<br />




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users